Google trial ends as judge weighs key US antitrust claims – Republic World

Google court delay: In a turning point for the technology industry, Google and the U.S. Department of Justice have wrapped up closing arguments on allegations that Google’s dominance of Internet search and advertising violates antitrust laws. The outcome of this case, which the government says has significant implications for the future of the Internet, rests with U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington.
During the proceedings, Judge Mehta examined both parties, focusing primarily on whether platforms such as ByteDance’s TikTok and Meta’s Facebook and Instagram could be considered viable alternatives for advertisers. The question of whether Google’s conduct violates civil antitrust law is looming, with experts anticipating possible changes in Google’s business practices pending the judge’s ruling.
Key to the arguments was the study of Google’s advertising revenue, which makes up a significant portion of its total revenue. The government alleged that this revenue stream is the linchpin of Google’s monopoly power, claiming that the company can manipulate prices and product quality with impunity.

Google’s TikTok, Facebook woes

Google’s defense highlighted the evolving landscape of digital advertising, citing the rise of competing platforms and Google’s continued efforts to innovate its advertising products. They argued that competition from platforms like TikTok and Facebook limits Google’s pricing power, and highlighted Google’s continued commitment to improving its offerings.
Throughout the trial, the government underscored Google’s alleged anticompetitive behavior, including claims of intentional document destruction. Witnesses, including representatives from Verizon and Samsung Electronics, testified about Google’s efforts to maintain its dominance, such as through lucrative deals to secure default search placement on smartphones and browsers.
Judge Mehta also raised concerns about Google’s document retention policies, questioning whether the company adequately retained relevant material. Google’s defense insisted its practices were reasonable and resisted calls for sanctions.

The case, filed during the Trump administration, represents a broader effort to tackle the market power of tech giants. With similar actions underway against companies like Meta, Amazon and Apple, the outcome of this lawsuit could set important precedents for antitrust regulation in the technology sector.

(With Reuters inputs)